NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM and ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 525 MHz
- 8.4x more texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 2.1 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 96 vs 40
- 6.1x better floating-point performance: 257.28 gflops vs 42 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 6.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 738 vs 114
- 9.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3974 vs 426
- 9.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3974 vs 426
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 February 2010 vs 28 June 2007 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 525 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 2.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops vs 42 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 738 vs 114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3974 vs 426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3974 vs 426 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 69 Watt
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 346 vs 242
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 69 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 346 vs 242 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 | 346 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 738 | 114 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11231 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3974 | 426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3974 | 426 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GT215 | RV610 |
Launch date | 2 February 2010 | 28 June 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 953 | 954 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 525 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops | 42 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | 2.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 727 million | 180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 27.2 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |