NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 620 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 39.7 billion / sec vs 17.6 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 3.7x better floating-point performance: 952.3 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1928 vs 738
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 242
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 2 February 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 39.7 billion / sec vs 17.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops vs 257.28 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1928 vs 738 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 vs 242 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
- Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 69 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 77% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11231 vs 6362
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3974 vs 3347
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3974 vs 3347
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 69 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11231 vs 6362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3974 vs 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3974 vs 3347 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1928 | 738 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 242 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6362 | 11231 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.12 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 664.78 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.003 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 33.983 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.007 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2649 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | 3974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2649 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | 3974 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF114 | GT215 |
| Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 2 February 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 951 | 952 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 550 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | 257.28 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 39.7 billion / sec | 17.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 69 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 727 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB / s | 27.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M vs
ATIRadeon HD 2400 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 340 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M vs
AMDFirePro M4000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M370
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M vs
AMDRadeon 680M
