NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
2x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
6.3x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 75 Watt
2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 221 vs 109

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 September 2010 vs 10 March 2009
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	12 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	221 vs 109

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM

4x more texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 3.0 billion / sec
Around 25% better floating-point performance: 120 gflops vs 96 gflops
Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 800 MHz
Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 381 vs 286
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1962 vs 1570
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1962 vs 1570

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	12 GTexel / s vs 3.0 billion / sec
Floating-point performance	120 gflops vs 96 gflops
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	381 vs 286
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1962 vs 1570
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1962 vs 1570

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

286

381

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

221

109

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1570

1962

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1570

1962

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark	286	381
PassMark - G2D Mark	221	109
Geekbench - OpenCL	751
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	442
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1158
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1158
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1570	1962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1570	1962

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	Tesla
Code name	GF108	G94B
Launch date	3 September 2010	10 March 2009
Place in performance rating	1393	1395
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	500 MHz
CUDA cores	48
Floating-point performance	96 gflops	120 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	48	48
Texture fill rate	3.0 billion / sec	12 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	12 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	505 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Length		229 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB / s	24 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory type	(G)DDR3	DDR2
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11	DirectX 11
Optimus