NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 96 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 532 vs 286
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2387 vs 751
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 967 vs 442
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 vs 1158
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1570
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 967 vs 442
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 vs 1158
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1570
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 3 September 2010 |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops vs 96 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 532 vs 286 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2387 vs 751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 967 vs 442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 vs 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 967 vs 442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 vs 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1570 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 221 vs 152
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 33 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 221 vs 152 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 532 | 286 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 | 221 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2387 | 751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.055 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.393 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.903 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 967 | 442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 | 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 1570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 967 | 442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 | 1158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 1570 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | GF108 | GF108 |
| Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 3 September 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1390 | 1393 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| CUDA cores | 96 | 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 48 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 12 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 585 million |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Texture fill rate | 3.0 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | (G)DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
AMDFirePro M8900
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6230
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7540D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
IntelHD Graphics 5000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 710M
