NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 11.2 billion / sec vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 96 vs 16
- 6.8x better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) vs 500 MHz
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 603 vs 126
- 6.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 vs 30
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1713 vs 497
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1624 vs 688
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1713 vs 497
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1624 vs 688
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 October 2010 vs 12 October 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) vs 500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 603 vs 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 vs 30 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1713 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1624 vs 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1713 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1624 vs 688 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 30.5 Watt vs 49 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2438 vs 2223
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1402 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30.5 Watt vs 49 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2438 vs 2223 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 603 | 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 30 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2223 | 2438 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.396 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 87.094 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.243 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.005 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.764 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1713 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1624 | 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1713 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1624 | 688 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF108 | GT218 |
| Launch date | 11 October 2010 | 12 October 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | $29.49 |
| Place in performance rating | 1505 | 1674 |
| Price now | $35.99 | $32.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 20.89 | 6.81 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1402 MHz |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 96 | |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | 105 °C |
| Pipelines | 96 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec | 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 30.5 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 260 million |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | 2.731" (6.9 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 6.60" (16.8 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 - 28.8 GB / s | 8.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GS
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GS
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 610i
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 550M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 3000M
