NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 3000M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 18 GTexel / s vs 11.2 billion / sec
  • 2.5x more pipelines: 240 vs 96
  • Around 61% better floating-point performance: 432.0 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 2.8x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)
  • Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 599
  • Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 312 vs 199
  • Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3798 vs 2242
  • 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.95 vs 3.396
  • 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 325.007 vs 87.094
  • 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.865 vs 0.243
  • 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.794 vs 5.005
  • 7.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.961 vs 3.764
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 22 February 2011 vs 11 October 2010
Texture fill rate 18 GTexel / s vs 11.2 billion / sec
Pipelines 240 vs 96
Floating-point performance 432.0 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 2500 MHz vs 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 995 vs 599
PassMark - G2D Mark 312 vs 199
Geekbench - OpenCL 3798 vs 2242
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.95 vs 3.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 325.007 vs 87.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.865 vs 0.243
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.794 vs 5.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 27.961 vs 3.764

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

  • 3.1x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 450 MHz
  • Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1080 vs 218
  • 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1713 vs 374
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1624 vs 543
  • 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1080 vs 218
  • 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1713 vs 374
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1624 vs 543
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1400 MHz vs 450 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 49 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1080 vs 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1713 vs 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1624 vs 543
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1080 vs 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1713 vs 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1624 vs 543

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
995
599
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
312
199
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3798
2242
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.95
3.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
325.007
87.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.865
0.243
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13.794
5.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27.961
3.764
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
218
1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
374
1713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
543
1624
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
218
1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
374
1713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
543
1624
Name NVIDIA Quadro 3000M NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
PassMark - G3D Mark 995 599
PassMark - G2D Mark 312 199
Geekbench - OpenCL 3798 2242
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.95 3.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 325.007 87.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.865 0.243
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.794 5.005
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 27.961 3.764
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 218 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 374 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 543 1624
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 218 1080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 374 1713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 543 1624
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

Essentials

Architecture Fermi Fermi
Code name GF104 GF108
Launch date 22 February 2011 11 October 2010
Launch price (MSRP) $398.96 $79
Place in performance rating 1500 1501
Price now $199.95 $35.99
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 7.98 20.89

Technical info

Core clock speed 450 MHz 1400 MHz
Floating-point performance 432.0 gflops 268.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 240 96
Texture fill rate 18 GTexel / s 11.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 49 Watt
Transistor count 1,950 million 585 million
CUDA cores per GPU 96
Maximum GPU temperature 98 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
Bus support PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height 2.713" (6.9 cm)
Length 5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.2

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 80.0 GB / s 25.6 - 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2500 MHz 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
CUDA