NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 120 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 603 vs 381
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 vs 109
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 October 2010 vs 10 March 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops vs 120 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 603 vs 381 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 vs 109 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 11.2 billion / sec
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1962 vs 1624
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1962 vs 1624
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 11.2 billion / sec |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1962 vs 1624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1962 vs 1624 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 603 | 381 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 109 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.396 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 87.094 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.243 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.005 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.764 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1624 | 1962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1624 | 1962 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
| Code name | GF108 | G94B |
| Launch date | 11 October 2010 | 10 March 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1505 | 1395 |
| Price now | $35.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 20.89 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 500 MHz |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 96 | |
| Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | 120 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
| Pipelines | 96 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec | 12 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 229 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 - 28.8 GB / s | 24 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GS
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GS
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7050 + nForce 610i
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 550M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 3000M
