NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX and NVIDIA GeForce 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 2x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 450 MHz
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 23 Watt
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 284 vs 210

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 320M

• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 59 vs 53
• Around 66% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2474 vs 1490
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1735 vs 1639
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1735 vs 1639

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 320M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	284 210
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	53 59
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1490 2474
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1639 1735
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1639 1735

Compare specifications (specs)