NVIDIA NVS 315 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 315 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 315

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 20 Watt
• Around 94% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 300 vs 283
• 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 179 vs 53

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX

• Around 72% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 523 MHz
• Around 72% higher texture fill rate: 7.2 billion / sec vs 4.184 GTexel / s
• Around 72% better floating-point performance: 172.8 gflops vs 100.4 gflops
• Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1490 vs 882
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.315 vs 3.025
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 122.375 vs 79.479
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.629 vs 4.705
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 15.403 vs 6.573
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 692 vs 465
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1583 vs 942
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1639 vs 1382
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 692 vs 465
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1583 vs 942
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1639 vs 1382

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 315
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	300 283
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	179 53
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	882 1490
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.025 3.315
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.479 122.375
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.705 7.629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.573 15.403
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	465 692
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	942 1583
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1382 1639
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	465 692
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	942 1583
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1382 1639

Compare specifications (specs)