NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX and NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 42% better floating-point performance: 172.8 gflops vs 121.44 gflops
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 23 Watt
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 284 vs 216
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 53 vs 42

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M

• Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 9.2 GTexel / s vs 7.2 billion / sec
• 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5251 vs 1490
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1903 vs 1639
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1903 vs 1639

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	284 216
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	53 42
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1490 5251
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1639 1903
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1639 1903

Compare specifications (specs)