NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6630M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 6630M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2305 vs 984
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.698 vs 2.847
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 175.385 vs 142.549
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1064 vs 424
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1589 vs 1055
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 2368
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1064 vs 424
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1589 vs 1055
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 2368
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 May 2011 vs 4 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2305 vs 984 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.698 vs 2.847 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 175.385 vs 142.549 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1064 vs 424 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1589 vs 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 vs 2368 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1064 vs 424 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1589 vs 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 vs 2368 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6630M
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 480 vs 96
- Around 79% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 26 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 685 vs 669
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 390 vs 233
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.527 vs 9.27
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops vs 268.8 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 26 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 685 vs 669 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 vs 233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.527 vs 9.27 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6630M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 6630M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 669 | 685 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 233 | 390 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2305 | 984 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.698 | 2.847 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 175.385 | 142.549 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.497 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.27 | 9.527 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1064 | 424 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1589 | 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 | 2368 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1064 | 424 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1589 | 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 | 2368 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.818 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 6630M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF108 | Whistler |
Launch date | 14 May 2011 | 4 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1373 | 1374 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 11.2 GTexel / s | 12 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 26 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |