NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 120 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 669 vs 381
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 233 vs 109
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 1962
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 1962
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 May 2011 vs 10 March 2009 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops vs 120 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 669 vs 381 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 233 vs 109 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 vs 1962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 vs 1962 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 669 | 381 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 233 | 109 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.698 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 175.385 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.497 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.27 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1589 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 | 1962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1589 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 | 1962 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
Code name | GF108 | G94B |
Launch date | 14 May 2011 | 10 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1373 | 1376 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | 120 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 11.2 GTexel / s | 12 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 229 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 24 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2 |