NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 25% higher core clock speed: 876 MHz vs 700 MHz
• Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 14.02 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
• Around 25% better floating-point performance: 336.4 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 736 vs 666
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 276 vs 233
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.367 vs 5.698
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1227 vs 1064
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1745 vs 1589
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1227 vs 1064
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1745 vs 1589

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM

• Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
• Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2305 vs 1835
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 175.385 vs 118.389
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.497 vs 0.396
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.27 vs 7.921
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 2261
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 2261

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	736 666
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	276 233
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1835 2305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.367 5.698
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	118.389 175.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.396 0.497
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.921 9.27
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1227 1064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1745 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2261 2716
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1227 1064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1745 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2261 2716

Compare specifications (specs)