NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 876 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 14.02 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 336.4 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 734 vs 669
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 277 vs 233
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.367 vs 5.698
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1227 vs 1064
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1745 vs 1589
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1227 vs 1064
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1745 vs 1589
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 14 May 2011 |
Core clock speed | 876 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 14.02 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 336.4 gflops vs 268.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 734 vs 669 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 vs 233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.367 vs 5.698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1227 vs 1064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1745 vs 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1227 vs 1064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1745 vs 1589 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2305 vs 1822
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 175.385 vs 118.389
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.497 vs 0.396
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.27 vs 7.921
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 2261
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 2261
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2305 vs 1822 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 175.385 vs 118.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.497 vs 0.396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.27 vs 7.921 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 vs 2261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 vs 2261 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 734 | 669 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 | 233 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1822 | 2305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.367 | 5.698 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 118.389 | 175.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.396 | 0.497 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.921 | 9.27 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.393 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1227 | 1064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1745 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2261 | 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1227 | 1064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1745 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2261 | 2716 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K600 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK107 | GF108 |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 14 May 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 1371 | 1373 |
Price now | $78.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.66 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 876 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 336.4 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 14.02 GTexel / s | 11.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |