NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 144 vs 96
- Around 56% better floating-point performance: 388.8 gflops vs 249.6 gflops
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 661 vs 539
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2833 vs 1634
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.438 vs 4.25
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1134 vs 929
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2265 vs 1210
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2827 vs 1524
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1134 vs 929
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2265 vs 1210
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2827 vs 1524
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 October 2011 vs 15 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 144 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 388.8 gflops vs 249.6 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 661 vs 539 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2833 vs 1634 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.438 vs 4.25 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1134 vs 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2265 vs 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2827 vs 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1134 vs 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2265 vs 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2827 vs 1524 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 187 vs 112
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 vs 112 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 661 | 539 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 112 | 187 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2833 | 1634 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.438 | 4.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 252.895 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.717 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.581 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.909 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1134 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2265 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2827 | 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1134 | 929 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2265 | 1210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2827 | 1524 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | GF106 | GF106 |
Launch date | 27 October 2011 | 15 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1414 | 1417 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 753 MHz | |
CUDA cores | Up to 144 | 96 |
Floating-point performance | 388.8 gflops | 249.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 144 | 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,170 million |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Texture fill rate | 7.8 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | large |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory type | DDR3\DDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
DirectCompute |