NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 6.5 billion / sec vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
- 4x better floating-point performance: 155.5 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 30.5 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1024 MB vs 512 MB
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 322 vs 126
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 131 vs 30
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 835 vs 497
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1155 vs 688
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 835 vs 497
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1155 vs 688
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 April 2012 vs 12 October 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 48 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 30.5 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1024 MB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 322 vs 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 vs 30 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 835 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1155 vs 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 835 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1155 vs 688 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Around 73% higher core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 810 MHz
- 500x more memory clock speed: 500 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 90% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2438 vs 1283
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1402 MHz vs 810 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2438 vs 1283 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 322 | 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 | 30 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1283 | 2438 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.233 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.053 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 835 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1155 | 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 835 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1155 | 688 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF119 | GT218 |
| Launch date | 2 April 2012 | 12 October 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | $29.49 |
| Place in performance rating | 1626 | 1674 |
| Price now | $39.99 | $32.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.13 | 6.81 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 1402 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 48 | 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 102 °C | 105 °C |
| Pipelines | 48 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec | 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 30.5 Watt |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | 2.731" (6.9 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 6.60" (16.8 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1024 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 8.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7500 LE
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4570
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce G100 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8250
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 600
