NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 69 Watt
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 131 vs 46
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 April 2012 vs 17 November 2009 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 69 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 vs 46 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 810 MHz
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 6.5 billion / sec
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
- Around 65% better floating-point performance: 257.28 gflops vs 155.5 gflops
- 1700x more memory clock speed: 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 501 vs 322
- 7.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9236 vs 1283
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1979 vs 835
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1385 vs 1155
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1979 vs 835
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1385 vs 1155
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 6.5 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 257.28 gflops vs 155.5 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 501 vs 322 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9236 vs 1283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1979 vs 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1385 vs 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1979 vs 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1385 vs 1155 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 322 | 501 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 131 | 46 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1283 | 9236 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.471 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.233 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.053 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 835 | 1979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1155 | 1385 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 835 | 1979 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1155 | 1385 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GF119 | GT215 |
Launch date | 2 April 2012 | 17 November 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | $80 |
Place in performance rating | 1626 | 1394 |
Price now | $39.99 | $37.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.13 | 22.27 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 1340 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | 96 |
Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops | 257.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 102 °C | 105C C |
Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 6.5 billion / sec | 17.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 69 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 727 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA | DVIVGAHDMI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 6.6" (168mm) (16.8 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1024 MB | 512 MB or 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 54.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA | ||
3D Vision |