NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2333 vs 1679
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2333 vs 1679
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3257 vs 3077
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3257 vs 3077
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 October 2012 vs 7 January 2010 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2333 vs 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2333 vs 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3257 vs 3077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3257 vs 3077 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
- 8.3x more pipelines: 800 vs 96
- 4.7x better floating-point performance: 1,120.0 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1082 vs 479
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 218 vs 141
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2070 vs 999
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2070 vs 999
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,120.0 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1082 vs 479 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 vs 141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2070 vs 999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2070 vs 999 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 479 | 1082 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 141 | 218 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2229 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 999 | 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 999 | 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2333 | 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2333 | 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3257 | 3077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3257 | 3077 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.17 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 585.971 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.86 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.108 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.606 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GF117 | Broadway |
| Launch date | 1 October 2012 | 7 January 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1208 | 1211 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Floating-point performance | 240.0 gflops | 1,120.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 800 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 1,040 million |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | |
| Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| HDMI 1.3a | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670D
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M vs
AMDFirePro W2100
