NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
  • 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
  • 3.1x better floating-point performance: 732.7 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
  • 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1580 vs 479
  • 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 384 vs 141
  • Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4071 vs 2229
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2446 vs 999
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2446 vs 999
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 March 2013 vs 1 October 2012
Pipelines 384 vs 96
Floating-point performance 732.7 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1580 vs 479
PassMark - G2D Mark 384 vs 141
Geekbench - OpenCL 4071 vs 2229
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2446 vs 999
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2446 vs 999

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

  • 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 51 Watt
  • Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2333 vs 1631
  • Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3257 vs 1974
  • Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2333 vs 1631
  • Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3257 vs 1974
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 51 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2333 vs 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3257 vs 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2333 vs 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3257 vs 1974

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1580
479
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
384
141
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4071
2229
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2446
999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1631
2333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1974
3257
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2446
999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1631
2333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1974
3257
Name NVIDIA Quadro K2000 NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1580 479
PassMark - G2D Mark 384 141
Geekbench - OpenCL 4071 2229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 265.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 38.219
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2446 999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1631 2333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1974 3257
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2446 999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1631 2333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1974 3257
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Fermi 2.0
Code name GK107 GF117
Launch date 1 March 2013 1 October 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $599
Place in performance rating 1211 1212
Price now $164.99
Type Workstation Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 11.74

Technical info

Core clock speed 954 MHz
Floating-point performance 732.7 gflops 240.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 96
Texture fill rate 30.53 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 51 Watt 15 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 585 million
CUDA cores 96

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 202 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Bus support PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12 API
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus