NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3257 vs 1913
  • Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3257 vs 1913
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 October 2012 vs 22 March 2012
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3257 vs 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3257 vs 1913

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

  • 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
  • 2.7x better floating-point performance: 652.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1201 vs 479
  • Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 235 vs 141
  • Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3799 vs 2229
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2283 vs 999
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2283 vs 999
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3299 vs 2333
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3299 vs 2333
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 384 vs 96
Floating-point performance 652.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1201 vs 479
PassMark - G2D Mark 235 vs 141
Geekbench - OpenCL 3799 vs 2229
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2283 vs 999
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2283 vs 999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3299 vs 2333
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3299 vs 2333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
479
1201
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
141
235
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2229
3799
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
999
2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
999
2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2333
3299
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2333
3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3257
1913
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3257
1913
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
PassMark - G3D Mark 479 1201
PassMark - G2D Mark 141 235
Geekbench - OpenCL 2229 3799
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 999 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 999 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2333 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2333 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3257 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3257 1913
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 340.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 18.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 23.111
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 414

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi 2.0 Kepler
Code name GF117 GK107
Launch date 1 October 2012 22 March 2012
Place in performance rating 1212 1214
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

CUDA cores 96 384
Floating-point performance 240.0 gflops 652.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 96 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 1,270 million
Boost clock speed 950 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536 Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0 PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 API 12 API
OpenCL 1.1 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3\GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus
3D Vision