NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3257 vs 1913
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3257 vs 1913
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 October 2012 vs 22 March 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3257 vs 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3257 vs 1913 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 652.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1206 vs 479
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 235 vs 141
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3846 vs 2229
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2283 vs 999
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2283 vs 999
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3299 vs 2333
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3299 vs 2333
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1206 vs 479 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 vs 141 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3846 vs 2229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2283 vs 999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2283 vs 999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3299 vs 2333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3299 vs 2333 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 479 | 1206 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 141 | 235 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2229 | 3846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 999 | 2283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 999 | 2283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2333 | 3299 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2333 | 3299 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3257 | 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3257 | 1913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.947 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.824 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.982 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.773 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.111 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GF117 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 1 October 2012 | 22 March 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1208 | 1210 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| CUDA cores | 96 | 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 240.0 gflops | 652.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 1,270 million |
| Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670D
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M vs
AMDFirePro W2100
