NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3257 vs 1913
Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3257 vs 1913

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 October 2012 vs 22 March 2012
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3257 vs 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3257 vs 1913

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
2.7x better floating-point performance: 652.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1204 vs 479
Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 235 vs 141
Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3793 vs 2229
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2283 vs 999
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2283 vs 999
Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3299 vs 2333
Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3299 vs 2333

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	384 vs 96
Floating-point performance	652.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1204 vs 479
PassMark - G2D Mark	235 vs 141
Geekbench - OpenCL	3793 vs 2229
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2283 vs 999
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2283 vs 999
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3299 vs 2333
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3299 vs 2333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

479

1204

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

141

235

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2229

3793

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

999

2283

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

999

2283

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2333

3299

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2333

3299

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3257

1913

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3257

1913

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
PassMark - G3D Mark	479	1204
PassMark - G2D Mark	141	235
Geekbench - OpenCL	2229	3793
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	999	2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	999	2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2333	3299
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2333	3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3257	1913
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3257	1913
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		9.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		340.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		18.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		23.111
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		414

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GF117	GK107
Launch date	1 October 2012	22 March 2012
Place in performance rating	1213	1215
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
CUDA cores	96	384
Floating-point performance	240.0 gflops	652.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	96	384
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	1,270 million
Boost clock speed		950 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
API support
DirectX	12 API	12 API
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3\GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11	DirectX 11	DirectX 11
Optimus
3D Vision