NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 vs AMD Radeon HD 6570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 and AMD Radeon HD 6570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 681 vs 559
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 218
- Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2473 vs 1561
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.498 vs 4.278
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.502 vs 0.464
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 vs 1044
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 vs 1044
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 May 2012 vs 7 February 2011 |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 681 vs 559 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 vs 218 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2473 vs 1561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 vs 4.278 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.502 vs 0.464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 vs 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 vs 1044 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 12.96 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 480 vs 96
- 2x better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 311.0 gflops
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 255.525 vs 140.06
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.633 vs 9.613
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 59.183 vs 12.49
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1296 vs 1151
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 2073
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1296 vs 1151
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 2073
- 5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 846 vs 170
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 12.96 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops vs 311.0 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 vs 140.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 vs 9.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 vs 12.49 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 vs 1151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 vs 2073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 vs 1151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 vs 2073 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 vs 170 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | AMD Radeon HD 6570 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 681 | 559 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 218 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2473 | 1561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 | 4.278 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 140.06 | 255.525 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.502 | 0.464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 | 13.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.49 | 59.183 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 | 1296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 | 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2073 | 2716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 | 1296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 | 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2073 | 2716 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 | 846 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GF108 | Thames |
| Launch date | 15 May 2012 | 7 February 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | $79 |
| Place in performance rating | 1440 | 1426 |
| Price now | $99.21 | $49.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.89 | 19.92 |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 311.0 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 480 |
| Texture fill rate | 12.96 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 716 million |
| Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 480 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||