NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 96 vs 64
• Around 44% better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 176 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 59 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 768 MB
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 540 vs 404
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 151 vs 65
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2917
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2917

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	540 404
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	151 65
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 2917
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 2917

Compare specifications (specs)