NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M vs AMD Radeon HD 7670M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M and AMD Radeon HD 7670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 538 vs 473
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 150 vs 91
- Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2399 vs 1417
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.055 vs 2.47
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.004 vs 210.901
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 vs 2194
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3341
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 vs 2194
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3341
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 17 February 2012 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 538 vs 473 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 vs 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2399 vs 1417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.055 vs 2.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 vs 210.901 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 vs 2194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 vs 2194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3341 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7670M
- 5x more pipelines: 480 vs 96
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
- Around 65% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 33 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1228 vs 967
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1228 vs 967
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 480 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1228 vs 967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1228 vs 967 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7670M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | AMD Radeon HD 7670M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 538 | 473 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2399 | 1417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.055 | 2.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 | 210.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.903 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 967 | 1228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 | 2194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 967 | 1228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 | 2194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3341 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | AMD Radeon HD 7670M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF108 | Thames |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 17 February 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1403 | 1404 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $629.99 | |
Price now | $629.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.48 | |
Technical info |
||
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 480 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 716 million |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | DDR3, (GDDR5) |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |