NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 33 Watt
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 188 vs 150
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 February 2013 vs 22 March 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 188 vs 150 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
- Around 51% better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 167.8 gflops
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 538 vs 353
- Around 78% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2398 vs 1345
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.055 vs 2.857
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 967 vs 629
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 vs 1102
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2918
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 967 vs 629
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 vs 1102
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2918
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops vs 167.8 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 538 vs 353 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2398 vs 1345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.055 vs 2.857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 967 vs 629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 vs 1102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 967 vs 629 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 vs 1102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 2918 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 353 | 538 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 188 | 150 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1345 | 2398 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.857 | 5.055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 629 | 967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1102 | 2766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2918 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 629 | 967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1102 | 2766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2918 | 3359 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.903 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GF119 | GF108 |
Launch date | 18 February 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1401 | 1403 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 874 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 167.8 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 6.992 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 13.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |