NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1000M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
- Around 29% better floating-point performance: 326.4 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 778 vs 539
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 249 vs 150
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1162 vs 967
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1162 vs 967
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 vs 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 192 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops vs 253.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 778 vs 539 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 249 vs 150 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1162 vs 967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1162 vs 967 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2404 vs 1739
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.055 vs 4.636
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.004 vs 115.549
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.454
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.393 vs 7.024
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.903 vs 10.485
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 vs 1695
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2297
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 vs 1695
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2297
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2404 vs 1739 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.055 vs 4.636 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.004 vs 115.549 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 vs 0.454 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.393 vs 7.024 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.903 vs 10.485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2766 vs 1695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 2297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2766 vs 1695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 2297 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K1000M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 778 | 539 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 249 | 150 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1739 | 2404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.636 | 5.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 115.549 | 215.004 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.454 | 0.635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.024 | 10.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.485 | 19.903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1162 | 967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1695 | 2766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2297 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1162 | 967 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1695 | 2766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2297 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK107 | GF108 |
Launch date | 1 June 2012 | 22 March 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119.90 | |
Place in performance rating | 1402 | 1403 |
Price now | $149.90 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |