NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M vs AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M and AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 144 vs 80
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 559 vs 165
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 800 vs 401
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 vs 746
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 vs 1763
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 800 vs 401
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 vs 746
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 vs 1763
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 5 January 2012 |
Pipelines | 144 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 559 vs 165 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 800 vs 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 vs 746 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 vs 1763 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 800 vs 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 vs 746 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 vs 1763 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
- Around 84% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 187 vs 171
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2802 vs 2535
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 vs 171 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2802 vs 2535 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 559 | 165 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 187 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2535 | 2802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.332 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 205.545 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.932 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.728 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 800 | 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 | 746 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 | 1763 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 800 | 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 | 746 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 | 1763 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF116 | Cedar |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 5 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1462 | 1463 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 753 MHz | |
CUDA cores | Up to 144 | |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 144 | 80 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 292 million |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |