NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 2.7x more pipelines: 384 vs 144
• 2.8x better floating-point performance: 711.2 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5016 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.451 vs 5.332
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 370.814 vs 205.545
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.075 vs 0.635
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.902 vs 10.932
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2483 vs 800
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3406 vs 1833
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4045 vs 2418

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

• Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.728 vs 22.557
• 19x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 800 vs 42
• 33.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 vs 55
• 33.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 vs 72.2

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.451 5.332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	370.814 205.545
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.075 0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.902 10.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.557 22.728
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2483 800
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3406 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4045 2418
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42 800
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	55 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	72.2 2418

Compare specifications (specs)