NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M vs AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M and AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 559 vs 337
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 171 vs 136
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2535 vs 882
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 800 vs 733
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 vs 1104
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 vs 1614
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 800 vs 733
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 vs 1104
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 vs 1614
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 20 June 2011 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 559 vs 337 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 vs 136 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2535 vs 882 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 800 vs 733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 vs 1104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 vs 1614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 800 vs 733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 vs 1104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 vs 1614 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP
- 2.2x more pipelines: 320 vs 144
- Around 12% better floating-point performance: 283.52 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
Pipelines | 320 vs 144 |
Floating-point performance | 283.52 gflops vs 253.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 559 | 337 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 136 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2535 | 882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.332 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 205.545 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.932 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.728 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 800 | 733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 | 1104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 | 1614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 800 | 733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 | 1104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 | 1614 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF116 | BeaverCreek |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 20 June 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1462 | 1465 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 753 MHz | |
CUDA cores | Up to 144 | |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | 283.52 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 144 | 320 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,450 million |
Core clock speed | 443 MHz | |
Texture fill rate | 7.09 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |