NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M vs AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M and AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 79% better floating-point performance: 253.4 gflops vs 141.76 gflops
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 559 vs 255
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 171 vs 146
- 6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2535 vs 422
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 vs 873
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2418 vs 1434
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 vs 873
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 vs 1434
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 1 November 2011 |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops vs 141.76 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 559 vs 255 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 vs 146 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2535 vs 422 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 vs 873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 vs 1434 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 vs 873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 vs 1434 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 160 vs 144
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
Pipelines | 160 vs 144 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 559 | 255 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 146 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2535 | 422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.332 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 205.545 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.635 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.932 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.728 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 800 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 | 873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 | 1434 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 800 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 | 873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 | 1434 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | AMD Radeon HD 6370D IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF116 | WinterPark |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 1 November 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1462 | 1464 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 753 MHz | |
CUDA cores | Up to 144 | |
Floating-point performance | 253.4 gflops | 141.76 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 144 | 160 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,180 million |
Core clock speed | 443 MHz | |
Texture fill rate | 3.54 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |