NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.753 vs 15.32
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2479 vs 2167
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2479 vs 2167
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 November 2013 vs 24 April 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.753 vs 15.32 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2479 vs 2167 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2479 vs 2167 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 25.5 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 612.1 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.932 vs 2.692
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 254.345 vs 161.29
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.14 vs 0.55
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.613 vs 11.858
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1502 vs 1263
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1502 vs 1263
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 25.5 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 612.1 gflops vs 297.6 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.932 vs 2.692 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 254.345 vs 161.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.14 vs 0.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.613 vs 11.858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1502 vs 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 3327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1502 vs 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 3327 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 551 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 144 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2530 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.692 | 9.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.29 | 254.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.55 | 1.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.858 | 13.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.753 | 15.32 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1263 | 1502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2479 | 2167 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3327 | 3334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1263 | 1502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2479 | 2167 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3327 | 3334 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GF117 | GK107 |
Launch date | 27 November 2013 | 24 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1366 | 1368 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 797 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 612.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 25.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |