NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 33% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 360.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 928 vs 450
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 146
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 7 January 2010 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops vs 360.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 928 vs 450 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 vs 146 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 650 MHz vs 645 MHz
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 400 vs 384
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 32 Watt
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3776 vs 3192
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 2580
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 2580
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz vs 645 MHz |
Pipelines | 400 vs 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 32 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3776 vs 3192 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 2580 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 2580 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 928 | 450 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 | 146 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3192 | 3776 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.861 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 275.972 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.727 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.445 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.381 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1476 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1963 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2580 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1476 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1963 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2580 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK107 | Madison |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 7 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1358 | 1360 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 645 MHz | 650 MHz |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 360.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 400 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 627 million |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | |
Texture fill rate | 9 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |