NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 59% higher core clock speed: 874 MHz vs 550 MHz
Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
Around 98% better floating-point performance: 167.8 gflops vs 84.8 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1600 MHz
2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 336 vs 137
2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 165 vs 57

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 March 2014 vs 19 August 2008
Core clock speed	874 MHz vs 550 MHz
Pipelines	48 vs 32
Floating-point performance	167.8 gflops vs 84.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size	1 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	1650 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	336 vs 137
PassMark - G2D Mark	165 vs 57

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT

Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 8.8 GTexel / s vs 6.992 GTexel / s
Around 26% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 29 Watt
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1465 vs 1187
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1465 vs 1187

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	8.8 GTexel / s vs 6.992 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	23 Watt vs 29 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1465 vs 1187
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1465 vs 1187

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

336

137

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

165

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1187

1465

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1187

1465

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
PassMark - G3D Mark	336	137
PassMark - G2D Mark	165	57
Geekbench - OpenCL	1367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	3.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	84.603
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.294
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	10.608
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	513
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	677
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1187	1465
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	513
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	677
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1187	1465

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Tesla
Code name	GF119	G96
Launch date	27 March 2014	19 August 2008
Place in performance rating	1582	1579
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	874 MHz	550 MHz
Floating-point performance	167.8 gflops	84.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	48	32
Texture fill rate	6.992 GTexel / s	8.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	29 Watt	23 Watt
Transistor count	292 million	314 million
CUDA cores		32
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
Maximum VGA resolution		1920x1200
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-II
Length	145 mm
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	13.2 GB / s	25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1650 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR2, GDDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CUDA
PCI-E 2.0