NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 47% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 650 MHz
• 3.6x more texture fill rate: 15.26 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• 12x more pipelines: 192 vs 16
• 10.9x better floating-point performance: 366.3 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 347
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 194
• 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1946 vs 538
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.146 vs 7.36
• Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 vs 12.009
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 977 vs 754
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 977 vs 754

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 vs 6.705
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 vs 100.391
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 vs 0.441
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1833
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1833

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	623 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	212 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1946 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.705 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	100.391 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.441 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.146 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.64 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	977 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	977 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 2392

Compare specifications (specs)