NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 versus Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 47% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 650 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 15.26 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s
- 12x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 16
- 10.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 366.3 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 versus 347
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 versus 194
- 3.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1946 versus 538
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.146 versus 7.36
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 versus 12.009
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 977 versus 754
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 977 versus 754
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 versus 14 May 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 versus 16 |
Performance á point flottant | 366.3 gflops versus 33.6 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt versus 45 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 versus 347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 versus 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 versus 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 versus 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 versus 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 versus 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 versus 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 versus 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 versus 1492 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 versus 6.705
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 versus 100.391
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 versus 0.441
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 versus 1833
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 versus 1833
Caractéristiques | |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 versus 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 versus 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 versus 0.441 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 versus 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 versus 1833 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 8.712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 155.638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 0.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 2392 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Generation 7.0 |
Nom de code | GK208B | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 | 14 May 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1488 | 1501 |
Prix maintenant | $34.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 650 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Performance á point flottant | 366.3 gflops | 33.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 16 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s | 4.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 292 million | 1,200 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo | ||
Quick Sync |