NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
3.5x more texture fill rate: 15.26 GTexel / s vs 4.4 billion / sec
12x more pipelines: 192 vs 16
12.5x better floating-point performance: 366.3 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 169
5.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 38
Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1833 vs 1016
Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 vs 1016

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 March 2014 vs 1 August 2008
Texture fill rate	15.26 GTexel / s vs 4.4 billion / sec
Pipelines	192 vs 16
Floating-point performance	366.3 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 80 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	19 Watt vs 50 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	623 vs 169
PassMark - G2D Mark	212 vs 38
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1833 vs 1016
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1833 vs 1016

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 954 MHz
400x more memory clock speed: 400 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1796 vs 1494
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1796 vs 1494

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1400 MHz vs 954 MHz
Memory clock speed	400 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1796 vs 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1796 vs 1494

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

623

169

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

212

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1494

1796

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1833

1016

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1494

1796

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1833

1016

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GT 710	NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark	623	169
PassMark - G2D Mark	212	38
Geekbench - OpenCL	1946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	100.391
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.441
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	8.146
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	20.64
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	977
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1494	1796
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1833	1016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	977
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1494	1796
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1833	1016
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	192

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 710	NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Tesla
Code name	GK208B	G86
Launch date	27 March 2014	1 August 2008
Launch price (MSRP)	$34.99	$79.99
Place in performance rating	1488	1460
Price now	$34.99	$79.99
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	23.15	3.05
Technical info
Core clock speed	954 MHz	1400 MHz
CUDA cores	192	16
Floating-point performance	366.3 gflops	29.376 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	80 nm
Maximum GPU temperature	95 °C	105 °C
Pipelines	192	16
Texture fill rate	15.26 GTexel / s	4.4 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	19 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	292 million	210 million
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	S / PDIF
Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVI
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	PCI-E 2.0
Height	2.713" (6.9 cm)	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)	6.6" (16.8 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.5	2.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1.8 GB/s	400 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR2
Technologies
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
PhysX
PureVideo
SLI