NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 73% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
- Around 42% better floating-point performance: 366.3 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 69 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date | 27 March 2014 vs 2 February 2010 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Pipelines | 192 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops vs 257.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 69 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s
- 1700x more memory clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 738 vs 623
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 242 vs 212
- 5.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11231 vs 1946
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3974 vs 1833
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3974 vs 1833
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 738 vs 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 vs 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11231 vs 1946 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3974 vs 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3974 vs 1833 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 738 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 242 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | 11231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 3974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 3974 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GK208B | GT215 |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 | 2 February 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1488 | 958 |
Price now | $34.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 550 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | 257.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 69 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 727 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 27.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |