NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 vs ATI Radeon HD 4650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 and ATI Radeon HD 4650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 600 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 48 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB or 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 614 vs 238
- 6.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 200 vs 30
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 September 2014 vs 10 September 2008 |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 48 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB or 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 614 vs 238 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 200 vs 30 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4650
- Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 19.2 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 384.0 gflops vs 306.0 gflops
- Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1891 vs 519
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1891 vs 519
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s vs 12.75 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops vs 306.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1891 vs 519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1891 vs 519 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | ATI Radeon HD 4650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 614 | 238 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 200 | 30 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2292 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.418 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.734 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.395 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.158 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.317 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 895 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 280 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 519 | 1891 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 895 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 280 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 519 | 1891 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | ATI Radeon HD 4650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GK208B | RV730 |
Launch date | 29 September 2014 | 10 September 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $49 | |
Place in performance rating | 1593 | 1590 |
Price now | $54.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.44 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 600 MHz |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 12.75 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 48 Watt |
Transistor count | 514 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 193 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB or 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5) | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 / GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA |