NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 266.7x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
| Launch date | 18 June 2014 vs 6 September 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 140 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 5.4x more texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 960 vs 384
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 692.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 830
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 253
- 3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 vs 2902
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 vs 10.872
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 vs 166.832
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 vs 0.817
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 vs 12.415
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.69 vs 36.916
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 vs 1951
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 1693
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 3324
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 vs 1951
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 1693
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 3324
- 4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1307 vs 327
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops vs 692.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 vs 830 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 253 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 vs 2902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 vs 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 vs 166.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 vs 0.817 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 vs 12.415 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 vs 36.916 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 vs 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 3324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 vs 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 3324 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 vs 327 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3365 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 1307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | GF108 | GK106 |
| Launch date | 18 June 2014 | 6 September 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | $229 |
| Place in performance rating | 1311 | 740 |
| Price now | $54.99 | $349.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | 14.35 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 960 |
| Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 2,540 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
