NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 266.7x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Launch date | 18 June 2014 vs 10 May 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 7.1x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 692.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 6.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5345 vs 830
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 vs 253
- 5.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15511 vs 2902
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.613 vs 10.872
- 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 971.208 vs 166.832
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.281 vs 0.817
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.404 vs 12.415
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 86.208 vs 36.916
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 vs 1951
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 1693
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3324
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 vs 1951
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 1693
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3324
- 5.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1839 vs 327
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops vs 692.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 vs 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 vs 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15511 vs 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 vs 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 vs 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 vs 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 vs 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.208 vs 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 vs 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 vs 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1839 vs 327 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 5345 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 537 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 15511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 41.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 971.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 4.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 40.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 86.208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 7038 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 7038 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 1839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
Code name | GF108 | GK104 |
Launch date | 18 June 2014 | 10 May 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 1311 | 554 |
Price now | $54.99 | $474.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | 13.20 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 3,540 million |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |