NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 625 MHz
• 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
• Around 44% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
• Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 62 Watt
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.872 vs 10.229
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.916 vs 19.02
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 vs 1600
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1693 vs 1682
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 2668
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 vs 1600
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1693 vs 1682
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 2668

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000

• Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 20 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
• Around 63% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 947 vs 830
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 253
• Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3879 vs 2902
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 258.26 vs 166.832
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.885 vs 0.817
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.688 vs 12.415

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	830 947
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	253 303
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2902 3879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.872 10.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	166.832 258.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.817 0.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.415 13.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.916 19.02
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1951 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1693 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3324 2668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1951 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1693 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3324 2668

Compare specifications (specs)