NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 versus NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 625 MHz
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- Environ 44% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 692.7 gflops versus 480.0 gflops
- Environ 27% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 62 Watt
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.872 versus 10.229
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.916 versus 19.02
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 versus 1600
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1693 versus 1682
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 versus 2668
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 versus 1600
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1693 versus 1682
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 versus 2668
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 versus 24 December 2010 |
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz versus 625 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops versus 480.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 62 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 versus 10.229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 versus 19.02 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 versus 1600 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 versus 1682 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 versus 2668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 versus 1600 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 versus 1682 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 versus 2668 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 2000
- Environ 39% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 20 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Environ 63% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2600 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 947 versus 830
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 versus 253
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3879 versus 2902
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 258.26 versus 166.832
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.885 versus 0.817
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.688 versus 12.415
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2600 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 947 versus 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 versus 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3879 versus 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 258.26 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.885 versus 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.688 versus 12.415 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 947 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 303 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 3879 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 10.229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 258.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 0.885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 13.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 19.02 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 1600 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 1682 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 2668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 1600 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 1682 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 2668 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF108 | GF106 |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 | 24 December 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | $599 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1311 | 1287 |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | $87.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | 17.65 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 625 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s | 20 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 62 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,170 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 178 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 41.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |