NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A vs AMD Radeon R9 270
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A and AMD Radeon R9 270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 714 vs 567
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 July 2014 vs 13 November 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 714 vs 567 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270
- 5.1x more texture fill rate: 74 GTexel / s vs 14.38 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
- 4.3x better floating-point performance: 2,368 gflops vs 552.2 gflops
- 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4306 vs 743
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 1436
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 1436
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 1711
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 1711
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 74 GTexel / s vs 14.38 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,368 gflops vs 552.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4306 vs 743 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 1436 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 1436 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 1711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 1711 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 743 | 4306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 714 | 567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1436 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1436 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1711 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1711 | 3347 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74175 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.721 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1282.039 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.927 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 261.843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3448 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3448 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1603 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A | AMD Radeon R9 270 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK208 | Curacao |
Launch date | 1 July 2014 | 13 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 520 | 521 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 719 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 552.2 gflops | 2,368 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 14.38 GTexel / s | 74 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 150 Watt |
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 210 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |