NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A vs AMD Radeon R9 270
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A and AMD Radeon R9 270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 714 vs 567
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 July 2014 vs 13 November 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 714 vs 567 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270
- 5.1x more texture fill rate: 74 GTexel / s vs 14.38 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
- 4.3x better floating-point performance: 2,368 gflops vs 552.2 gflops
- 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4306 vs 743
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 1436
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 1436
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 1711
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 1711
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 74 GTexel / s vs 14.38 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,368 gflops vs 552.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4306 vs 743 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 1436 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 1436 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 1711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 1711 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 743 | 4306 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 714 | 567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1436 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1436 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1711 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1711 | 3347 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 74175 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.721 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1282.039 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.927 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.116 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 261.843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3448 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3448 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1603 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A | AMD Radeon R9 270 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK208 | Curacao |
| Launch date | 1 July 2014 | 13 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 519 | 520 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 719 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 552.2 gflops | 2,368 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
| Texture fill rate | 14.38 GTexel / s | 74 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 1280 | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730A vs
ATIRadeon X1300 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730A vs
NVIDIAGeForce 205 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730A vs
AMDRadeon Sky 500
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730A vs
AMDRadeon R9 270
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730A vs
AMDRadeon E9550 MXM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730A vs
NVIDIARTX A500 Mobile
