NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 5.8x more texture fill rate: 34.72 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 833.3 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- 5.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3011 vs 540
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2916 vs 1044
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 1702
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 November 2013 vs 5 January 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 750 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 160 |
| Floating-point performance | 833.3 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3011 vs 540 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2916 vs 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 vs 1702 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
- Around 85% lower typical power consumption: 27 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 10.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 540 vs 51
- 22.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1044 vs 47
- 28.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1702 vs 59.6
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 27 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 540 vs 51 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 vs 47 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1702 vs 59.6 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.243 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 393.811 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.966 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.793 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.139 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3011 | 540 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2916 | 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 51 | 540 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 47 | 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 59.6 | 1702 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 289 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 790 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 437 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GK107 | Caicos |
| Launch date | 8 November 2013 | 5 January 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1487 | 1490 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1085 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 833.3 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 160 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 27 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon HD 7470 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon HD 7420G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs
AMDFirePro M2000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs
IntelHD Graphics 615
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 DDR4
