NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and AMD FirePro M2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• 2.2x more core clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 2.9x more texture fill rate: 34.72 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
• Around 74% better floating-point performance: 833.3 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 3200 MHz
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.243 vs 3.284
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 393.811 vs 195.801
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.966 vs 0.31
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.793 vs 10.402
• 5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3011 vs 544
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2916 vs 1498
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 1709

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M2000

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
• Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.254 vs 19.139
• 10.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 544 vs 51
• 31.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1498 vs 47
• 28.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1709 vs 59.6

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M2000

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.243 3.284
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	393.811 195.801
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.966 0.31
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.793 10.402
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.139 44.254
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3011 544
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2916 1498
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3335 1709
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	51 544
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	47 1498
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	59.6 1709

Compare specifications (specs)