NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs ATI Radeon 9800 PRO

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M and ATI Radeon 9800 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 2.6x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 380 MHz
• 10.3x more texture fill rate: 31.36 GTexel / s vs 3.04 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
• 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
• 7.9x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 680 MHz
• 25.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1687 vs 66
• Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 322 vs 175

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9800 PRO

• Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 50 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9800 PRO

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1687 66
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	322 175

Compare specifications (specs)