Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7094 vs 4930
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2015 vs 25 June 2013
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 7094 vs 4930

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

  • 3.3x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1710 vs 1436
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 331 vs 305
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 vs 2675
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 vs 2675
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 1290
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 1290
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 3157
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 3157
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 48
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1710 vs 1436
PassMark - G2D Mark 331 vs 305
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3093 vs 2675
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3093 vs 2675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3504 vs 1290
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3504 vs 1290
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3344 vs 3157
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3344 vs 3157

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1436
1710
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
305
331
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7094
4930
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2675
3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2675
3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1290
3504
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1290
3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3157
3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3157
3344
Name Intel Iris Graphics 550 NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1436 1710
PassMark - G2D Mark 305 331
Geekbench - OpenCL 7094 4930
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2675 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2675 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1290 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1290 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3157 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3157 3344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 12.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 455.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 28.025
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2148

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Graphics 550 NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.0 Kepler
Code name Skylake GT3e GK107
Launch date 1 September 2015 25 June 2013
Place in performance rating 958 961
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 980 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,270 million
Floating-point performance 752.6 gflops
Texture fill rate 31.36 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12 API
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Memory type eDRAM GDDR5
Shared memory 1 0
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5400 MHz
Standard memory configuration GDDR5

Technologies

Quick Sync
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus