Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7094 vs 4930
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 25 June 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7094 vs 4930 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1710 vs 1436
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 331 vs 305
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 vs 2675
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 vs 2675
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 1290
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 1290
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 3157
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 3157
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1710 vs 1436 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 331 vs 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3093 vs 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3093 vs 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 vs 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 vs 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 vs 3157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 vs 3157 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1436 | 1710 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 305 | 331 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7094 | 4930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2675 | 3093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2675 | 3093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1290 | 3504 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1290 | 3504 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3157 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3157 | 3344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.449 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 455.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.566 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.025 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2148 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Graphics 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | GK107 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 25 June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 958 | 961 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 980 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,270 million |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |