NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M vs ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M and ATI Radeon IGP 340M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 4.2x more core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 183 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 180 nm
- 183.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 551 vs 3
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 145 vs 102
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 November 2013 vs 5 October 2002 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 183 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 180 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 551 vs 3 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 145 vs 102 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon IGP 340M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M | ATI Radeon IGP 340M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 551 | 3 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 145 | 102 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2531 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.692 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.29 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.55 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.858 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.753 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1263 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2479 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3327 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1263 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2479 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3327 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M | ATI Radeon IGP 340M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Rage 6 |
| Code name | GF117 | RS200 |
| Launch date | 27 November 2013 | 5 October 2002 |
| Place in performance rating | 1368 | 1365 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 183 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 180 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | |
| Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 30 million |
| Boost clock speed | 180 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Shared memory | yes | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 820M vs
ATIRadeon IGP 340M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 820M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6230
NVIDIAGeForce GT 820M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5570
NVIDIAGeForce GT 820M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K600
NVIDIAGeForce GT 820M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M255
NVIDIAGeForce GT 820M vs
IntelHD Graphics
