NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M vs AMD Radeon HD 6230
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M and AMD Radeon HD 6230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 96 vs 80
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 104 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 552 vs 179
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1263 vs 252
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2479 vs 744
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3327 vs 1293
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1263 vs 252
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2479 vs 744
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3327 vs 1293
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 November 2013 vs 2 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops vs 104 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 552 vs 179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1263 vs 252 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2479 vs 744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3327 vs 1293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1263 vs 252 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2479 vs 744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3327 vs 1293 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6230
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 146
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 vs 146 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6230
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M | AMD Radeon HD 6230 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 552 | 179 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 146 | 254 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2498 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.692 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.29 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.55 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.858 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1263 | 252 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2479 | 744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3327 | 1293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1263 | 252 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2479 | 744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3327 | 1293 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M | AMD Radeon HD 6230 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF117 | Park |
Launch date | 27 November 2013 | 2 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1365 | 1368 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 104 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2 |