NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M and NVIDIA Quadro K600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 41 Watt
• Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
• Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2498 vs 1822
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.29 vs 118.389
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.55 vs 0.396
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.858 vs 7.921
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.753 vs 9.393
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1263 vs 1227
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2479 vs 1745
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3327 vs 2261
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1263 vs 1227
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2479 vs 1745
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3327 vs 2261

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K600

• Around 13% higher core clock speed: 876 MHz vs 775 MHz
• Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 14.02 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
• Around 13% better floating-point performance: 336.4 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 734 vs 560
• Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 277 vs 147
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.367 vs 2.692

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	560 734
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	147 277
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2498 1822
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.692 6.367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	161.29 118.389
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.55 0.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.858 7.921
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.753 9.393
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1263 1227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2479 1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3327 2261
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1263 1227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2479 1745
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3327 2261

Compare specifications (specs)