NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM
- Around 21% better floating-point performance: 470.0 gflops vs 387.1 gflops
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 141 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 82% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Floating-point performance | 470.0 gflops vs 387.1 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 141 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 738 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
Core clock speed | 1836 MHz vs 738 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 594 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 55 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3108 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3108 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92 | G92B |
Launch date | 10 March 2009 | 4 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1050 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $114.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.91 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 1836 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 470.0 gflops | 387.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 47.2 GTexel / s | 47.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 141 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, Two Dual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 6-pin |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | 70.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |