NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M and ATI Mobility Radeon X1700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 475 MHz
- 10x more texture fill rate: 19 billion / sec vs 1.9 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 64 vs 12
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 6.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 679 vs 105
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 308 vs 228
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 March 2009 vs 1 February 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 475 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 19 billion / sec vs 1.9 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 64 vs 12 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 679 vs 105 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 vs 228 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X1700
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M | ATI Mobility Radeon X1700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 679 | 105 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 | 228 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3221 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3221 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M | ATI Mobility Radeon X1700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | R500 |
| Code name | G94 | M66 |
| Launch date | 3 March 2009 | 1 February 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 791 | 793 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 475 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | |
| Gigaflops | 288 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 64 | 12 |
| Texture fill rate | 19 billion / sec | 1.9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 505 million | 157 million |
| Boost clock speed | 475 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Display Connectors | VGADisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMILVDSSingle Link DVI | No outputs |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 400 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | 128 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PureVideo HD | ||
| Powerplay 6.0 | ||
